- Military Media
- Posts
- The 180 Day Rule
The 180 Day Rule
Should veterans leaving active duty have to wait half a year before applying to work at DoD?


The USAF Thunderbird aircraft performers aerial maneuvers during the Wings Over Columbus 2022 Airshow March 25, 2022, on Columbus Air Force Base, MS. Eight officers serve as the Thunderbirds highly experienced pilots, and four serve in critical roles from medical support to public affairs. PHOTO VIA DVIDS (U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman Jake Jacobsen)
The 180 Day Rule
Our first piece covers a topic that potentially affects everyone leaving active duty in the military. The Military Officers Association of America (MOAA), a professional association of US military officers, believes that it’s time for a closer look at a key rule governing the employment of veterans in civilian positions with the Department of Defense. They’re helping sponsor the Retain Skilled Veterans Act, a bipartisan effort that aims to do away with the mandatory 180-day waiting period one must observe after leaving the military before being hired by DoD.
In a statement posted to its website, the MOAA said that this 180 day constraint inconveniences veterans, and makes it difficult for DoD to fill key positions. According to the MOAA, this is hamstringing national defense. The rule was suspended between 2001 and 2016 during the state of national emergency declared after 9/11, and MOAA does not believe that this rule/constraint is necessary anymore.
Why was the rule adopted in the first place? In the years after WWII and the Korean War, hiring unqualified veterans into government service was seen as a problem — so much so, that it prompted research culminating in the publication in 1961 of a DoD memorandum named for the Deputy Secretary of Defense who signed it, Roswell L. Gilpatric. Testifying before Congress, Gilpatric recommended that the rule be made into an executive action and left to the discretion of DoD — but Congress went a step further, and codified it into law in 1964.
One can read about the strange history of what has come to be known as “the 180 day rule” in a report issued under the Obama Administration, “Veteran Hiring in the Civil Service: Practices and Perceptions,” available here. The fourth section of the report offers a good overview. I was most surprised to learn that the law targeted what was seen as widespread inequitable hiring that disadvantaged civilians and was unmeritocratic. As such, the 180 day rule was conceived as being part of the broader movement against discrimination in the workplace, and therefore related to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 — not, as I had imagined, something targeting corruption in procurement. It wasn’t observed between 2001-2016, and, according to the Obama-era report, it was rarely observed even beforehand, and loaded with so many caveats it might as well have been worthless.
Times change, as do the circumstances facing veterans. The veterans of GWOT who are retiring today are not in danger of overwhelming civilian employers, as were (apparently) the veterans of WWII and Korea, nor are they seen as disadvantaging better-qualified civilians, competitively. The legislation favored by MOAA is H.R. 939 in the House, introduced by Reps. Blake Moore (R-Utah) and Derek Kilmer (D-Wash.), and S. 334 in the Senate, introduced by Sens. James Lankford (R-Okla.) and Kyrsten Sinema (I-Ariz). If you have strong feelings about doing away with the 180 day rule or keeping it, these are the people to contact, or their staffs.
In Business and Finance
Is the price of a new car beyond the reach of consumers? Increasingly, yes. A series of defaults suggest that increasingly, people cannot afford their auto loans.
Money markets are suddenly extremely profitable!
Arm Holdings, Ltd., owned by Softbank, has filed for an IPO. The company makes semiconductors for smart phones, and investors are excited about its potential to produce chips to help drive an expected Artificial Intelligence boom.
News From Around the Military
Families of Marines who were killed in V-22 Osprey crashes are still waiting for answers.
The State Department blessed off on the sale of nearly 100 Apache AH-64E attack helicopters to Poland. The deal will net a cool $12 billion. More importantly, it strengthens a key piece of the NATO alliance with a fearsome offensive capability.
An unflattering story describes sexism and prejudice faced by women in U.S. Special Operations.
News That Impacts Veterans And Their Families
Bad news for one recipient of a retail license to sell marijuana in New York State is good news for four disabled veterans, who brought suit against the state. The lawsuit claims that veterans were illegally passed over for consideration when the licenses were being assigned.
Scientists are amassing evidence that previously inexplicable diseases and conditions among US veterans and firefighters are related to PFAS, microscopic toxic elements that make their way into the body, but more research is needed.
Millions of service members and veterans may still be eligible to receive financial compensation or health care related to toxic exposure, according to Steve Miska, PACT Act transitional executive director.
Commentary and Analysis
Ongoing problems scaling ammunition production have Americans and Europeans thinking outside the box. One idea is related to a model that’s worked in China, writes Nadia Schadlow for Breaking Defense.
Meanwhile, Stephen Biddle discusses a surprising characteristic of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — how low-tech the whole thing has been. In an era characterized by people focused on AI and tech disruption, there’s something to be said for a pistol that won’t jam when you’re clearing a trench.
Why did the US invade Iraq? This article may not provide the answer, but it does lay out the arguments, two decades after the events.
Bail was set for Donald Trump at $200,000, or around one year of his salary as president. Presumably the judge decided that the current frontrunner for the GOP nomination for president in 2024 was not a flight risk.
A Little Laughter
Duffel Blog’s got a good one up above the fold — about a colonel who leaves the service to flip bases.